Knowledge base: the money's route at a crypto casino

The money comes in as a coin, but not as the coin alone

The first document on the money's route is the list of accepted coins. Casinos usually place it on the cashier page and not in the terms, which is why there is no clause number the reader could point to. Of the thirty lists read, one brand gave forty entries and another only one. Between those extremes there are lists with two, three and a dozen or so entries.

Bitcoin appears on 29 of the 30 lists read, ether on 28, litecoin and USDT on 23 each. Next come DOGE with 18 and BNB and XRP with 15 mentions. This is not a ranking of currencies, only a record of what the operators decided to show.

Choosing the coin does not close the account, because the second cost comes from the network it is sent over: the network fee on deposit and withdrawal. The earlier stretch, before the first deposit, has its own obstacle in Poland, described in the card will not go through when the operator's domain is in the register. The whole of it is described by the page crypto casino.

Thirty lists are the only countable basis for this stretch of the route. The absence of a list at the remaining brands does not mean that the coin is not accepted, only that we did not read the document. A short list says less than a long one, but both require a check in the cashier before the first deposit.

Choosing the coin alone does not show how much it costs to send it between wallets. In the documents read there was no provision about a deposit commission, so the network cost remains an empty field and not a zero amount. The details of who bears the network fee are gathered in the entry about networks and fees.

The balance has a currency, but no published exchange rate

Once the coin is in the account, the question of the conversion rate arises. In the documents that opened during the review there was no clause with a rate or with a source for the rate. This gap concerns both bitcoins and stablecoins, although in the case of stablecoins the market has a price of its own.

An empty space here means that we did not read the figure, so we cannot say what rate will be applied. It is not proof that there is no rate or that the operator has no influence on its level. A document that is silent gives the reader no grounds to appeal, which is why in our database it is marked as unread.

One way round this question is a stablecoin, particularly USDT, which appeared on 23 of the 30 lists read. Being on the list is only a precondition; you also need to know whether the casino converts the stablecoin into the account currency. We describe this problem more fully in the article about stablecoins.

The withdrawal cap has a clause number or has none at all

The withdrawal cap is a rarely filled field. Fourteen brands out of a hundred publish a limit with a clause number. We did not read the provisions of the rest, so the reader has no document to point to, and cannot assume that the casino pays out without restriction. All the limits read are collected on the page about withdrawal limits.

The limits read fall into four periods: six weekly, five monthly, two daily and one per single withdrawal. The values are written in euros, dollars or USDT, and the highest of them is 1,000,000 USDT per week. In eight cases the unit is the euro, in three the dollar, in two USDT, and one limit was given as EUR/USD.

Even where the limit is known, a withdrawal need not be immediate. Some operators have the right to ask for a document before they send the money; 49 brands wrote such a clause and all of them keep that option open. In 27 cases the clause has a number, in 22 it stands on an unnumbered policies page; only five brands give the amount of the threshold.

A licence number is sometimes shared by several signs

Behind a casino's name there should be a number in a register that can be looked up. 68 brands out of a hundred give such a number, but there are 53 different numbers. Nine of those numbers serve several brands each, 24 brands in total, so the number of entries alone does not say how many entities actually operate under those signs.

The extreme case is the number ALSI-202508056-FI2, entered at five brands, behind which the register shows one company. Such a number makes it possible to establish the entity responsible for the licence, but it does not say what agreements bind it to the five brands.

Five brands give the number of a licence that has the status of revoked, and three of them share one number, OGL/2023/103/0067. Such an entry does not prove that the owners are the same, but it shows that a brand and a licence are different objects.

Poland appears on the list of excluded countries at 11 brands out of the 38 lists read. For 62 brands no such list was read, and absence from a list is not a statement by the operator that players from Poland are welcome. A fuller picture is given by the entry about operator licences.

Year of founding, game providers and fields left empty

Not every piece of information has a document that can be counted. Only 11 brands out of a hundred publish the year of founding, and the other dates circulating in comparisons have no source we could give. That is why we do not fill in the year with a guess in a description, but leave the field empty.

Game providers and the list of excluded countries look similar: each of these lists is published by 33 and 38 brands respectively. Providers say whose games are visible in the lobby, not on what terms the casino settles with the player. The conditions of individual games are separate documents, which should not be confused with the casino's terms.

The documents read also lack three economic categories: the deposit commission, the operator's spread and the conversion rate together with the source of that rate. This does not mean that these costs do not exist. A map of such places, which cannot be checked before depositing, leads to the entry what cannot be checked.

A figure with a clause, a figure without a clause and an empty field

In this database a figure with a clause number weighs more than a figure without a number. An example: a cap of 15,000 EUR/USD per week in clause 13 lets you go back to the terms and see the context. The list of accepted coins stands on the cashier page without numbering, so it can change without the terms changing.

Likewise, 68 brands with a licence number is different information from 53 different registrations. The first speaks of the operator's declaration, the second of the state of things after duplicates are removed. A reader who sees both figures can check for themselves where the document ends and processing begins.

The documents in the library were read on 26 August 2026, and one entry was reviewed again on 2 September 2026. When a page changes its content after that day, the comparison may differ from the current version of the terms. Some entries have the status unread, because the page did not open at the moment of the review; 21 such cases were noted during work on the database.

We treat an empty field unambiguously: it means that we did not read it. It does not mean that the operator does not require, does not charge or does not publish. We apply the same rule to the year of founding, the list of countries and every column that is missing.